The first thing I recalled after learning about this case, was the case of Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton [0]. I have heard arguments in the past for this kind of

The first thing I recalled after learning about this case, was the case of Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton [0]. I have heard arguments in the past for this kind of censorship. In my country (Panama) the closest thing is called "reserva del sumario," (secrecy of the proceedings) but there is no way enforce it legally against parties not involved in the trial afaiu. The most the former chief prosecutor (of a very corrupt governement) was able to call on the main journalistic association to remind journalists of their dury to respect the secrecy of the proceedings. I stand in favor of not limiting freedom of expression. We should not limit ourselves to framing the issue as one of free expression vs a free trial (or a free election, since I just mentioned a Latin American country). Risking being too optimistic, I think that instead of framing the issue as one overexposed potentially false suspicions or opinions, one should see it as one of underexposed relevant opinions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_Chamberlain-Creighton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_Chamberlain-Creighton