4 ms·
Corruption is a thing. The specific organizational model really doesn’t seem to matter much. In a game theoretic sense, I think the only option is to make whist
by jfoutz 8y ago
Corruption is a thing. The specific organizational model really doesn’t seem to matter much. In a game theoretic sense, I think the only option is to make whistleblowing optimal.
I like rules. Weird shadow rules that aren’t written down make me unreasonably angry. Corruption likes having two sets of rules.
I don’t know the mechanism. Automatic immunity for alleged whistleblowers _seems_ reasonable. There are ways to exploit that. But for an institutionalized system, maybe the losses are worth it.
- dluan 8y agoDid a quick skim of literature, and it seems accountability in structures is the check on two sets of rules. Whistleblowing, but also shorter terms, punishment, and trust seem like good strategies. Alas, defensive complexity should be the answer, but the appearance that it's not is what is confusing to me.