Australian newspapers are actually getting a bit creative in relation to this case due to the profile of the person. On the day of the conviction, they release

Australian newspapers are actually getting a bit creative in relation to this case due to the profile of the person. On the day of the conviction, they released online articles about "suppression orders". ----- * https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/why-the-media-is-unable-to-report-on-a-case-that-has-generated-huge-interest-online-20181212-p50lta.html https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/why-the-media-is... * https://outline.com/jVdYJr https://outline.com/jVdYJr # Why the media is unable to report on a case that has generated huge interest online # > A very high-profile figure was convicted on Tuesday of a serious crime, but we are unable to report their identity due to a suppression order. > The person, whose case has attracted significant media attention, was convicted on the second attempt, after the jury in an earlier trial was unable to reach a verdict. They will be remanded when they return to court in February for sentencing. ----- The article then goes on about suppression orders and how Google Trends for the person's name increased on the day of the trial. So anyone who is internet-savvy would be able to figure out who it was.