5 ms·
I don't know much about the history of India. But this video shows a huge part of present day India and Pakistan being part of the Mughal empire in 1705. Video
by nonamechicken 8y ago
I don't know much about the history of India. But this video shows a huge part of present day India and Pakistan being part of the Mughal empire in 1705.
Video: https://youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=628 https://youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=628 (at 10:28).
Some other interesting time lines from a union of India perspective from this video:
Maurya Empire: 270 BCE (at 2:01, https://youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=122 https://youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=122)
Delhi Sultanate: 1344 (at 8:44 https://youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=524 https://youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=524)
Edit: Found another video that matches with the above video regarding Mughal Empire: https://youtu.be/wYu2jyVTSc8?t=76 https://youtu.be/wYu2jyVTSc8?t=76 (at 1:16).
- iguy 8y agoThe analogous list is to point to the Romans in 100AD, and Charlemagne in 800, and Napoleon in 1800, and conclude that clearly the EU has always been a united super-state. The peaks were quite short-lived, often only one ruler's lifespan (natural or otherwise). There were long gaps between. There were many competing powers. And that's OK! I mean, are we sure that the world in which some Aurangzeb figure won, and created a united (persian-speaking, 100% sunni) subcontinent, is a better place?