2 ms·
What are drawbacks to their careers from agreeing not to review? I understand that reviewing is really a community service and done without tangible or much int
by klopthrow 8y ago
What are drawbacks to their careers from agreeing not to review? I understand that reviewing is really a community service and done without tangible or much intengible compensation. And reviewing is anonymous. For tenured professors, there should be few problems and Elsevier probably wont retaliate, or will they?
What are reasons for the controversay besides academic freedom?
- skosuri 8y agoHonestly nothing really. It’s more that there are papers that I am often the best person to review them (because of particular expertise). I often just don’t pay attention to where it’s coming from.