4 ms·
Well there was one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland A bipartisan moderate that everyone loved, reco
by lifeformed 8y ago
Well there was one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland
A bipartisan moderate that everyone loved, recommended by both parties, poised to take the nomination, then blocked for years by the Republican party just as a total partisan f-you to Obama.
- AcerbicZero 8y agoGarland would have made an excellent choice instead of Kagan, or even Sotomayor, if there was a desire for a more balanced, more centrist SCOTUS. However after those two nominations replacing Scalia with Garland was obviously a bridge too far which the R's could not accept. As unpopular as it may have been, In a way, I don't really blame them, and it seems to have paid off for them in the long run.
- zeveb 8y ago> blocked for years He was nominated on the 16th of March 2016; the election was on the eighth of November of the same year, and his nomination expired on the third of January 2017, less than a year later. No matter how you slice that, his nomination to the Supreme Court wasn't 'blocked for years.'
- lifeformed 8y agoWhoops, you're right. I got that bit wrong.