3 ms·
the same "eye for an eye" goes for "if you have nothing to hide" - well then, you first
by vbuwivbiu 8y ago
the same "eye for an eye" goes for "if you have nothing to hide" - well then, you first
- fhbdukfrh 8y agoYes, this approach assumes universal parity in the result of the act, which is far from true. For example the leaked health records of a healthy individual are not as damaging as those of someone with a lifelong condition, yet both cases are very, very bad.
- reaperducer 8y agothe same "eye for an eye" goes for "if you have nothing to hide" - well then, you first You misunderstand what "eye for an eye" means. "Eye for an eye" means let the punishment fit the crime. Before "eye for an eye" was established by religious texts, the common retaliation for poking someone's eye out was death. "Eye for an eye" was a step towards a more civilized justice system.
- vbuwivbiu 8y agoI use it in the context of Taleb's book, mentioned in the parent, wherein he discusses this - symmetrical risk