4 ms·

> and threatened with a sentence way out of proportion to the crime What I quoted says nothing more. And what I replied to was "if you can't do the time", impl

> and threatened with a sentence way out of proportion to the crime What I quoted says nothing more. And what I replied to was "if you can't do the time", implying "the time" was appropriate to the crime. > to suggest he was just a naughty schoolboy What in what I quoted suggests that? Can you quote the bits you consider "a load of nonsense"?

ryanlol 8y ago
>Can you quote the bits you consider "a load of nonsense"? The article attempts to defend Swartz by essentially claiming that what he did was unimpressive... So what? Same goes for SQL injection. In fact, most crimes are quite unimpressive. It's indisputable that both JSTOR and MIT actively tried to block Swartz, and that he actively circumvented those blocks. The article also makes the completely bullshit claim that Swartz could've realistically received a 35 year sentence.