> under cover of being within the wording of the law. > then CL using this method would have been in clear violation of the law DNS spoofing by an ISP a clear

> under cover of being within the wording of the law. > then CL using this method would have been in clear violation of the law DNS spoofing by an ISP a clear violation of the law? Since when? Just because the law makers don't say email doesn't mean they mean to hijack DNS. If someone asked you to pick up some food for them on the way home, are you doing to bring leftovers from two weeks ago because they didn't specify from where and exactly what they wanted? Blaming this on the lawmakers doesn't make sense. ISP had a broad way to use "electronic communications" and they chose a HORRIBLE one.