3 ms·
You're completely correct. We depend utterly on a lot of basic products of small towns and rural communities. That said, just because food and lumber has to be
by Kalium 8y ago
You're completely correct. We depend utterly on a lot of basic products of small towns and rural communities.
That said, just because food and lumber has to be grown somewhere doesn't mean it has to be grown in American small towns and rural communities. My wheat and rice can come from Mexico and Thailand and my beef from Argentina.
- flagfeedingusa 8y agoYoure a dispicable human, a pathetic excuse for an american and should be thrown out of the country immediately. hang all globalists
- freehunter 8y agoWhat's the delta between the environmental impact of growing wheat and beef etc locally vs shipping it 8000 miles?
- Kalium 8y agoTrans-oceanic shipping and trains are surprisingly low-impact per unit of food. When you add in the environmental impact of things like growing rice in Texas deserts and almonds in California, the results can easily come out in favor of trade. There are other considerations, too. Favoring local products is a good way to keep poor food-exporting countries poor. I don't want that, though I understand some people have different priorities from me.
- ProfessorLayton 8y agoThis is great until a major conflict happens between the US and the country responsible for a major food staple, and domestic production is decimated by imports, and there’s a food shortage.
- Kalium 8y agoThat sounds like excellent incentive for everyone to try to avoid and reduce the severity of conflicts.