(slow clap) good to see some criticism of news sources. I found this article to be of VERY LOW quality. Barely 5 paragraphs, took about 30 seconds to read. Ver

(slow clap) good to see some criticism of news sources. I found this article to be of VERY LOW quality. Barely 5 paragraphs, took about 30 seconds to read. Very little context, basically just parroting the gentleman's quote. No value, no conclusion. Thanks for nothing Julie Verhage. How is that even considered a news article? The only other story I can find on this quote right now is on CNBC. It's a little better. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/14/sipc-chief-raises-concerns-to-sec-about-robinhoods-free-checking-accounts.html https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/14/sipc-chief-raises-concerns-t... NOTE: I do think these are important points to report, and important to understand if you are considering using the service. I will watch the development of the Robinhood checking with an eyebrow raised. I just really hate poor quality writing from 'top' news outlets. We should demand better.