> rather, should small towns be additionally supported. This is the key question. No one wants to up and remove those towns. The question is: should we subsid

> rather, should small towns be additionally supported. This is the key question. No one wants to up and remove those towns. The question is: should we subsidize their existence beyond the infrastructure like road, mail, etc... that we already pay for? And if we want to do that, how do we go about it to get the most bang for our buck?