6 ms·

Big reason for this is probably pricing. Adobe's subscription model is hard on startups, small companies & especially individuals, so people naturally look at a

Big reason for this is probably pricing. Adobe's subscription model is hard on startups, small companies & especially individuals, so people naturally look at alternatives. And then they realize that Photoshop isn't quite the monopoly it once was, and apps like Sketch, Affinity & Co. offer similar feature set, while also being more specialized for the job.

toddmorey 8y ago
Pricing is a part of it, sure, but the real reason I think is that Sketch was designed from the group up to be a tool for creating digital UI. Without the clutter and legacy of Adobe Illustrator / Photoshop, it was a breath of fresh air. Also, I think it has an important advantage of feeling like a native Mac app. I always feel like I’m firing up a virtual machine when I start Adobe products.
- mattkevan 8y ago
  My fairly recent MacBook boots up in less time than Photoshop takes to open. Photoshop is amazing and I use it daily, but my goodness does it creak.
  - zozbot123 8y ago
    Photoshop is 'slow to open' because it takes more time than your laptop uses to boot? That's nothing - have you never used GIMP?
    - avian 8y ago
      On my aging Lynnfield i5 and spinning-rust HDD, GIMP takes 2 seconds to open (I just timed it - from pressing return in a terminal, to all windows appearing on screen). That is faster than most websites load these days. And I should add that I have quite a lot of custom Python plug-ins installed. There's a lot of valid points that can be criticized about GIMP. Speed is not one of them.
      - Amygaz 8y ago
        Same here. For small tasks I use GIMP because it’s a lot faster. Loading my VM is faster than loading any Adobe products.
- waivej 8y ago
  I actually use an old version of Photoshop in a Windows VM because it's faster than a native modern version. As a perk, I don't worry that it's going to break if I upgrade OSX.
  - kitsunesoba 8y ago
    It really is ridiculous. I spent a significant chunk of of my teenage years in Photoshop 6, 7, and CS1 doing all sorts of things and whenever I open it today I find myself shocked at how sluggish and weighed down it’s become. It’s still a powerful tool, but if I had the choice I would absolutely pay full price for a version of 7 or CS1 tweaked to run on modern OSes over the current subscription that feeds an infinite bloat cycle.
    - h1d 8y ago
      I guess it's time for modern alternatives. Adobe is getting dragged down by its own legacy code which would be a dead end like Windows or IE.
puranjay 8y ago
I had an individual Photoshop subscription that kept climbing in cost due to unfavorable dollar exchange rates. One day I audited my account and realized I was paying nearly INR 10k/year (>$120/year) for a tool I barely used, but stuck around with because I was just too comfortable with the UI. Ditched my subscription and started using PhotoPea.com. Same UI, no costs. For my lightweight use, it's perfect.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

toddmorey 8y ago

Pricing is a part of it, sure, but the real reason I think is that Sketch was designed from the group up to be a tool for creating digital UI. Without the clutter and legacy of Adobe Illustrator / Photoshop, it was a breath of fresh air. Also, I think it has an important advantage of feeling like a native Mac app. I always feel like I’m firing up a virtual machine when I start Adobe products.

mattkevan 8y ago
My fairly recent MacBook boots up in less time than Photoshop takes to open. Photoshop is amazing and I use it daily, but my goodness does it creak.
- zozbot123 8y ago
  Photoshop is 'slow to open' because it takes more time than your laptop uses to boot? That's nothing - have you never used GIMP?
  - avian 8y ago
    On my aging Lynnfield i5 and spinning-rust HDD, GIMP takes 2 seconds to open (I just timed it - from pressing return in a terminal, to all windows appearing on screen). That is faster than most websites load these days. And I should add that I have quite a lot of custom Python plug-ins installed. There's a lot of valid points that can be criticized about GIMP. Speed is not one of them.
    - Amygaz 8y ago
      Same here. For small tasks I use GIMP because it’s a lot faster. Loading my VM is faster than loading any Adobe products.
waivej 8y ago
I actually use an old version of Photoshop in a Windows VM because it's faster than a native modern version. As a perk, I don't worry that it's going to break if I upgrade OSX.
- kitsunesoba 8y ago
  It really is ridiculous. I spent a significant chunk of of my teenage years in Photoshop 6, 7, and CS1 doing all sorts of things and whenever I open it today I find myself shocked at how sluggish and weighed down it’s become. It’s still a powerful tool, but if I had the choice I would absolutely pay full price for a version of 7 or CS1 tweaked to run on modern OSes over the current subscription that feeds an infinite bloat cycle.
  - h1d 8y ago
    I guess it's time for modern alternatives. Adobe is getting dragged down by its own legacy code which would be a dead end like Windows or IE.

puranjay 8y ago

I had an individual Photoshop subscription that kept climbing in cost due to unfavorable dollar exchange rates. One day I audited my account and realized I was paying nearly INR 10k/year (>$120/year) for a tool I barely used, but stuck around with because I was just too comfortable with the UI. Ditched my subscription and started using PhotoPea.com. Same UI, no costs. For my lightweight use, it's perfect.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]