I fail to see how the first Harry Potter is less relevant to the ten-year olds today, than it was to the ten-year olds 20 years ago. Somehow you're simultaneou

I fail to see how the first Harry Potter is less relevant to the ten-year olds today, than it was to the ten-year olds 20 years ago. Somehow you're simultaneously complaining that the Potter series offers something for the older fans, and that the Potter series is too childish?