While it's funny to write a bot, at the same time you're right. It's not worth arguing with those people who just want to be mislead, and probably not worth wri

While it's funny to write a bot, at the same time you're right. It's not worth arguing with those people who just want to be mislead, and probably not worth writing a bot for it either. The problem is, arguments don't lead to insight. If those people could be swayed by rational arguments, they wouldn't be "climate skeptics" in the first place. So I think the pragmatic approach would be to understand your enemy before you try to engage.