3 ms·
He didn't just let it happen, he actively concealed it when he lied to Congress about it. At the very least he's an accessory after the fact under the governme
by elliekelly 8y ago
He didn't just let it happen, he actively concealed it when he lied to Congress about it. At the very least he's an accessory after the fact under the government's favorite prosecution crutch: the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
- ikeboy 8y agoWhat lie are you referring to?
- elliekelly 8y agohttps://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8xbezb/lawmakers-want-to-know-why-ajit-pai-made-up-ddos-attack-lied-to-congress https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8xbezb/lawmakers-...
- ikeboy 8y agoThat makes it quite clear he wasn't the source of the lies in question. I don't see any credible allegation that he lied here. Here's another article which states explicitly >Although the OIG report doesn't suggest that Pai deliberately misled Congress, it doesn't let FCC management off the hook entirely. Believing your chief information officer and relaying the information they give until you become aware that it was false doesn't mean you lied. https://www.wired.com/story/fcc-net-neutrality-investigation/ https://www.wired.com/story/fcc-net-neutrality-investigation...