>The source is pseudoscience... I agreed with you that it's a shit source. > ... not every single line that they write. Exactly. I pointed out that this part

>The source is pseudoscience... I agreed with you that it's a shit source. > ... not every single line that they write. Exactly. I pointed out that this particular headline was based in fact and provided a reliable source for that fact and pointed out where the "facts" stated by the article differed from the reliable source I provided. I fail to understand the egregious offense I've allegedly committed.