He's also asking for architectural diversity, though. He spends a long paragraph complaining that the buildings are "trite," "predictable," "without true histor

He's also asking for architectural diversity, though. He spends a long paragraph complaining that the buildings are "trite," "predictable," "without true historic reference," and all the other stuff that I associate with smug architects who design pretty, unusable public buildings. His other arguments make sense to an extent, but frankly I tend not to trust any architectural commentary from people who judge a building by its cover, and I think the criticisms in these comments bear that out.