I agree! But the popular conception of science as merely something falsifiable doesn't include that condition - my whole point here (which for some reason peopl

I agree! But the popular conception of science as merely something falsifiable doesn't include that condition - my whole point here (which for some reason people are downvoting me for...?) is that Popper's definition isn't sufficient, because it both includes pseudoscience (astrology) and excludes legitimate (exploratory) science.