3 ms·
The problem is that the companies get municipalities to compete to provide the best incentives package. With sufficient competition and assuming well meaning,
by QuotedForTruth 8y ago
The problem is that the companies get municipalities to compete to provide the best incentives package. With sufficient competition and assuming well meaning, rational government officials, the winning municipality will have to reduce their "margin" (new tax dollars - incentives) down to a very small amount. These incentives often require the government to take out large loans that they will be paying down for decades before realizing any actual new "profit."
Then factor in the fact that their will always be some municipalities with government officials who are willing to overspend (other people's money) for personal political points. When they win an RFP for a big factory, sports team/stadium, movie production, or corporate headquarters they get to have a flashy press conference touting all the jobs. This helps them in their political career which is often over well before the actual net value of the deal can be realized in 20 or 30 years.
- AlexTWithBeard 8y ago20 years sounds like a reasonable time for the investment to pay off. It's not mindblowingly tremendous, but not a catastrophe either.
- QuotedForTruth 8y agoSure, but the city is taking on risk that the business, sports team or factory is still around generating revenue for that entire time and after. Factories are often purpose built for whatever they will build. Retooling can be very expensive. Why would Foxconn for instance pay to retool their factory from LCD production to OLED or whatever new technology emerges in 10 years when they can just get another government to build them a new factory somewhere else?