3 ms·
> I disagree with your case, this is clearly an error because it should never get to dividing by 0. > No you misread my refutation, I make no claims of the err
by fao_ 8y ago
> I disagree with your case, this is clearly an error because it should never get to dividing by 0.
> No you misread my refutation, I make no claims of the errorness or exceptionness of dividing by 0,
Hmmm.
- sethrin 8y agoI understand them to be saying that if execution is supposed to be halted before the division occurs, then whether the division is an exception or an error is a moot point.