This is flawed on so many levels. 1. Just because a thing isn't a person, doesn't mean it can't/shouldn't be decent. 2. That thing was designed by humans whic

This is flawed on so many levels. 1. Just because a thing isn't a person, doesn't mean it can't/shouldn't be decent. 2. That thing was designed by humans which, inferring from your post, you can ask to be decent, ergo you can ask their thing to also be decent. 3. It would make a lot more sense for the business to care in the long term, rather than the short term, that's where maximum profit is. 4. I highly doubt she actively made "the decision to let a business deep into her personal life" since most of these services are opt-in by default. There's really no need to be so narrow-minded and out of touch with reality...