3 ms·
Yes, you're correct. We'll correct the mistake in the doc.
by gouthamve 8y ago
Yes, you're correct. We'll correct the mistake in the doc.
- GordonS 8y agoThis premise was very far off, and cost effectiveness is key to the design rationale - do you think this impacts upon the utility and attractiveness of Loki?
- gouthamve 8y agoYes, we have an internal doc where we compared with more providers (including loggly) where we got the pricing right. The line currently mentioned in the doc is a typo. The rationale still holds and one of the primary reasons we built Loki is to have a an easy to manage scalable "open-source" solution. I personally have been told to log less at a previous company because of the associated costs of logs and I don't think I utilised anything beyond grep (with a few exceptions). I personally feel the trade-offs are right and a simple greppable/tailable solution that is cheap is missing from the eco-system.
- GordonS 8y agoA good response, thanks for confirming that you've built this with the correct pricing in mind.