4 ms·
The cynical part of me thinks they'll end up pushing people towards iMessage, Facebook Messenger, and Whatsapp...coincidentally services owned by Californian co
by bmarquez 8y ago
The cynical part of me thinks they'll end up pushing people towards iMessage, Facebook Messenger, and Whatsapp...coincidentally services owned by Californian companies.
- jonathanoliver 8y agoMy thoughts exactly. This will push everyone to use WhatsApp or other 3rd-party tools. An unintended consequence of this would be less SMS spying by government agencies.
- Spivak 8y agoSMS is already ludicrously expensive compared to data rates, if consumers were price-conscious about this they would have already switched.
- paulie_a 8y agoI don't know how you can determine they are expensive. They are unlimited and included in the plan. There is a cost of course but if I send one or one hundred thousand, it's not going to cost more.
- x2f10 8y ago>It’s unclear how much individual consumers would be asked to pay their wireless carrier for texting services under the proposal. But it likely would be billed as a flat surcharge per customer — one of those irksome fees at the bottom of your wireless bill — not a fee per text. It's potentially unavoidable as carriers currently bundle text messaging w/ voice plans.