3 ms·
No, a site that sells drug testing kits is not a good source, and there's probably a good reason it is the best quote you could find. In any case, a car certain
by qjz 16y ago
No, a site that sells drug testing kits is not a good source, and there's probably a good reason it is the best quote you could find. In any case, a car certainly qualifies as a space that's confined enough to get high from second hand pot smoke. But it doesn't even matter if it's enough to get high, it's the smoke that's objectionable, which is obvious from the trend to prohibit smoking indoors in public places. This fight can't be won with facts, it requires a change of behavior. People simply don't want to inhale other people's smoke anymore.
Personally, I'm not against legalizing pot, just smoking it. It's the end of the day, and I'm about to have a drink. I'd much rather have a hash brownie, but I won't go near an illicit drug as long as I have a family to support.
- lotusleaf1987 16y agoBut what the company is saying is counter-productive to their business... If they were confirming your argument then it might be more reasonable to be skeptical but this company is turning away business otherwise, so I'm inclined to believe them. Also what do you mean there's a good reason it's it's the best quote I could find? I Googled it and went through the first 5-10 results... Also, marijuana smoke doesn't have free-radical particles and isn't carcinogenic--it doesn't cause cancer. And most, upwards of 80-90% of the psychoactive components of the smoke are absorbed by the first inhalation, the rest is exhaled into the air and becomes negligible once it mixes with the air supply. You are awfully judgmental.