2 ms·
It does appear to be the case of gross incompetence. In Norwegian newspapers comments section, most seamen and former Navy tend to suggest just that. This is N
by varjag 8y ago
It does appear to be the case of gross incompetence. In Norwegian newspapers comments section, most seamen and former Navy tend to suggest just that.
This is Norway though. In many other places the captain would be court martialed for that. Here he'd have his promotion delayed a few years at worst.
- Tor3 8y agoThe captain was not at the bridge during the situation though. He was off shift. He came to the bridge after the collision, and took over the radio communication. Very apparent in the way the communication was handled (after the crash).
- varjag 8y agoThe captain runs the ship and is in charge of the crew. It's the ultimate authority that comes with ultimate responsibility. If the crew was not seaworthy, letting it sail out if the port is the captain's fault.
- Tor3 8y agoOh, absolutely. The captain has responsibility. It's just that they're not that often on the bridge anymore. That demands a certain level of competence and trust as far as the bridge crew is concerned, of course.