Well, you implied the network wouldn't confirm the transactions. I don't think that's accurate. Here's your proof: November 28 press release announcing the two

Well, you implied the network wouldn't confirm the transactions. I don't think that's accurate. Here's your proof: November 28 press release announcing the two addresses added to the OFAC list: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm556 https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm556 Blockexplorer for address 1: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1AjZPMsnmpdK2Rv9KQNfMurTXinscVro9V https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1AjZPMsnmpdK2Rv9KQNfM... Blockexplorer for address 2: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/149w62rY42aZBox8fGcmqNsXUzSStKeq8C https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/149w62rY42aZBox8fGcmq... Note that both have confirmed transactions occurring after November 28. Now, I of course have no interested in sending a transaction myself since that's illegal under U.S. law, but that does not mean the network itself can be censored. (On a side note: how did you go from working at Coinbase to being such a crypto hater? I understand if you don't want to answer that, I was just genuinely curious.)