Thanks for the feedback on the draft. Regarding "topologically static", the system doesn't assume a fixed set of communicating endpoints (like MPI ranks). It

Thanks for the feedback on the draft. Regarding "topologically static", the system doesn't assume a fixed set of communicating endpoints (like MPI ranks). It will all you to dynamically add new participants to the network. Why is the gRPC comparison not fair? Shouldn't they do dynamic batching also? It can be done without unduly affecting latency. (I did my phd in stream processing studying this proposition, and Jonathan Goldstein and others have demonstrated the same thing in Trill.) In the case of AMBROSIA, our latency increase vs gRPC is not because of batching, but is because on waiting for the log to persist in georeplicated storage.