I don't know about anyone else, but I did not like your comment because it mixes up tons of technical and high-level detail and also does so in incredibly long

I don't know about anyone else, but I did not like your comment because it mixes up tons of technical and high-level detail and also does so in incredibly long form. You could have reduced the idea to "instead of embedding microchips in other microchips, why not make a device that simply allows one to disable the device remotely? Surely the size requirements would be much smaller" Instead you go semi-technical about something you know semi-nothing about.