4 ms·
> which meant the browser never crashed if a single website misbehaved I might have faulty memory, but this is not some minor detail. It is world changing. Fo
by kiriakasis 8y ago
> which meant the browser never crashed if a single website misbehaved
I might have faulty memory, but this is not some minor detail. It is world changing.
For young teenager me, Chrome had a vastly better UX than both IE and Firefox when it debuted.
(now I prefer Firefox though)
- josteink 8y ago> I might have faulty memory, but this is not some minor detail. It is world changing. I never had Firefox crash on me, so I never saw it as a selling point. I however saw tabs crash all the fucking time in Chrome, so to me it just seemed like a workaround for bad engineering. If anything was world changing to me, it was that now we were being told that tabs crashing all the time was normal.