4 ms·

I asked you for citations for your claims, yet instead I get diversion... Wrt having a usable browser, I'm literally using Firefox for Android to talk to you r

I asked you for citations for your claims, yet instead I get diversion... Wrt having a usable browser, I'm literally using Firefox for Android to talk to you right now. Firefox has been a usable browser for years, seems your salty tho. Please provide citations for: - Incompetent directors flying chartered jets and getting $1M USD remuneration for nothing. - All success Mozilla ever had was due to hard work of volunteer developers - All the money Mozilla directors scored was due to them slicing off the project piece by piece for last 10 years.

baybal2 8y ago
> https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2016/2016_Mozilla_Foundation_Forms_990_Public_Disclosure.pdf https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2016/2016_Mozilla_Fo... Page 7. Mitchel Baker 1,054,536. Jim Cook 985,899 And a list of 8 people with six digit salaries, out of whom 4 have their roles not even tangentially related to Mozilla's charter activities. And this is for Mozilla Foundation only. Mozilla corporation (M. F. Technologies) is keeping really below the water in terms of publicity. > All success Mozilla ever had was due to hard work of volunteer developers All popularity Firefox had gained was in time of it being a community project, when Mozilla did nothing but provide a CVS server and a bugzilla. You should've seen how they bled user share the more they turned into a commercial business for the past 17 years. > All the money Mozilla directors scored was due to them slicing off the project piece by piece for last 10 years. First take their revenue from getting generous payouts from Google, then from all others affiliate programs, including the ill famed pocket. $300m is a not a joke sum, very generous, more than they pay to any other affiliate http://allthingsd.com/20111222/google-will-pay-mozilla-almost-300m-per-year-in-search-deal-besting-microsoft-and-yahoo/ http://allthingsd.com/20111222/google-will-pay-mozilla-almos...

baybal2 8y ago

> https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2016/2016_Mozilla_Foundation_Forms_990_Public_Disclosure.pdf https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2016/2016_Mozilla_Fo... Page 7. Mitchel Baker 1,054,536. Jim Cook 985,899 And a list of 8 people with six digit salaries, out of whom 4 have their roles not even tangentially related to Mozilla's charter activities. And this is for Mozilla Foundation only. Mozilla corporation (M. F. Technologies) is keeping really below the water in terms of publicity. > All success Mozilla ever had was due to hard work of volunteer developers All popularity Firefox had gained was in time of it being a community project, when Mozilla did nothing but provide a CVS server and a bugzilla. You should've seen how they bled user share the more they turned into a commercial business for the past 17 years. > All the money Mozilla directors scored was due to them slicing off the project piece by piece for last 10 years. First take their revenue from getting generous payouts from Google, then from all others affiliate programs, including the ill famed pocket. $300m is a not a joke sum, very generous, more than they pay to any other affiliate http://allthingsd.com/20111222/google-will-pay-mozilla-almost-300m-per-year-in-search-deal-besting-microsoft-and-yahoo/ http://allthingsd.com/20111222/google-will-pay-mozilla-almos...