5 ms·
Forrest Mims' mini-notebooks were horrible. They consisted of circuits cribbed from app notes -- but with the explanatory text removed. There's no way to unders
by zipoff 8y ago
Forrest Mims' mini-notebooks were horrible. They consisted of circuits cribbed from app notes -- but with the explanatory text removed. There's no way to understand how circuits work by reading the mini-notebooks. They were specifically designed to keep readers ignorant so they would have to buy more of the lousy books. I plodded through the 555 timer book when I was a kid and didn't learn a single thing. If only I had known about databooks at the time, I could have called Signetics and they would have sent me a free copy of a book with all the same circuits and detailed theory of operations. I might have become an electrical engineer instead of a programmer.
I believe Mims was also the author of the awful manual for Rat Shack's 100-in-one kit, which told the lie that a bipolar junction transistor is two diodes back-to-back. This is only true in the literal sense that a transistor has two P-N junctions; it's like if you roll down your car window and ask a passer-by for directions, and he helpfully tells you that you're in your car. It omits the key feature of the transistor, namely transconductance. And after reading it, I couldn't understand transistors for decades. Eventually I got hold of a college-level textbook which explained that when the base-emitter junction is forward-biased, the collector-emitter path acts like a resistor. Simple and clear, unlike Mims' writing which is designed to obfuscate and confound.
- dzdt 8y agoLol. I had that 100-in-one kit and remember the transistor non-explanation. I remember the kit being kinda fun but not nearly so much as programming. With the hardware kit it was almost impossible to make anything outside of the limited recipes provided; with software it was easy to have your own ideas and make something new.
- lowercased 8y agoi had that 100-in-1 kit too, and yeah, it was pretty non-accessible for a kid. got a few of the things to "work", but not any real understanding of how to make changes to anything to try something different. always thought it was my own limited brain. then we got a sinclair zx81... and i never looked at hardware again.
- mr_overalls 8y ago> Forrest Mims' mini-notebooks were horrible. I used one of Mims' designs for a final project in an entry-level elecronics lab in college. I can't remember the specifics, but I think it was a little sender/receiver setup that transmitted audio over beam of light. When I couldn't get it to work after a bunch of troubleshooting, I showed it to the TA. I'll never forget his incredulous expression. "Where did you get this? This resistor should be ten times this value. This shouldn't be an electrolytic capacitor. This. . . hell, I don't know what they're even trying to do here." And so forth.