3 ms·
Why though? Email addresses are quite obviously "something that identifies a person".
by majewsky 8y ago
Why though? Email addresses are quite obviously "something that identifies a person".
- perl4ever 8y agoI'm not debating what's clear or not to me. My point is that it's subjective and if someone says a thing is unclear, you can not necessarily make it clear to them or force them to admit they are lying about their perception. Arguing with confusion is like debating whether someone is in pain when they act like they are. It could be they are lying. It could be they are not. It could be they are particularly stupid. I want to emphasize - you can be right or wrong about the GDPR, but that's not the same thing as being right or wrong about whether people are confused by it. I think it should be obvious that debating feelings or perceptions or emotions of other people tends to lead to unproductive interpersonal interactions, but perhaps others have not noticed this phenomenon. I can't imagine winning a debate with someone over whether they are trolling or not. Even if it's really obvious, nobody can see inner motivations for sure.
- eitland 8y ago> It could be they are lying. It could be they are not. It could be they are particularly stupid. At the point where one can prove that one part is too (trollish || stupid) I think it is reasonable to limit how much we care about their opinions.