3 ms·

Can anybody explain why this comment has so much downvotes, please?

• matchbok 8y ago
  Because this article is about concrete.
  • v_lisivka 8y ago
    Article is not about concrete. It's about effectiveness of concrete on modern battlefield (especially in guerilla-like war), with false claim that it's most effective weapon. As officer of army at war, I know that concrete will not help much at battlefield. Hard concrete causes ricochet, soft concrete spreads fragments. Concrete is not movable. Concrete is hard to recycle. Concrete is hard to destroy in case of retreat. In case of guerilla-like war, propaganda, agents, double agents, and false news are much more effective, about thousand times more effective than concrete. Make double agent in a guerilla, then spread false news about his glory, then shot in the back everybody who will join him. Problem solved.