I don’t think the rules are silly. I think they’re subjective. For what it’s worth, I think interventions to make Twitter feel safer for trans people are impor

I don’t think the rules are silly. I think they’re subjective. For what it’s worth, I think interventions to make Twitter feel safer for trans people are important. I’m sorry I said something that made you feel otherwise. I would prefer to do it in a way that women’s rights advocates can still do their work, but that’s probably impossible in the current climate. Safe spaces require a formal hierarchy of identities so you can resolve these issues. Either trans rights come first or uterus havers’s rights do. My preference would be that Twitter allows you to choose your mode of governance, so you can browse on “safe for trans people” mode or “safe for women” or “safe for conservatives” or whatever mode you prefer. We probably need multiple versions of each since there’s variation even within these categories. I don’t think there’s any way to do this within liberalism. It has to be an anarchist solution. It’s a mistake to think there’s a good universal answer.