3 ms·
>a lack of legitimacy Well... yes. And I view this as a good thing. The current US voting system is broken and I am not sure it is fixable simply by voting mor
by alasdair_ 8y ago
>a lack of legitimacy
Well... yes. And I view this as a good thing. The current US voting system is broken and I am not sure it is fixable simply by voting more - that simply entrenches the current system.
I prefer to use illegitimacy and disenfranchisement to spur useful change to the systems themselves. I want to see somethink like ranked choice with an instant runoff, the abolition of the electoral college and a simple one person, one vote choice for president, without dividing people into small groups first.
Reforming the senate is likely also a good idea.
Apathy and illegitimacy are the kindling needed to foster real change.
- ruseOps 8y agoReforming the senate, but not the house? Could you provide an example where you, personally, have used illegitimacy and disenfranchisement to spur useful change in a system? While discussing real change, it feels like we should be as exact as possible. Haphazardly enacted real change does not seem useful in the least.