4 ms·

I don't pay for either, but I'd also add: Netflix has a threshold level of quality. There's probably plenty on there I wouldn't want to watch, but nothing that

I don't pay for either, but I'd also add: Netflix has a threshold level of quality. There's probably plenty on there I wouldn't want to watch, but nothing that I'd deem offensively bad. YouTube, however, I find to be increasingly toxic. There is some amazing content on YouTube, which is often superior to traditional media, but I find I need to wade through increasing levels of garbage to get to it.

theWheez 8y ago
As a platform, YouTube's incentives don't serve the user as well as they could. A prime example was a video with millions of views on a very popular channel about 9/11 conspiracies. Did the YouTuber believe them? No. But cranking out a 10m+ video every day is more important than what he believes. Then you look at high quality channels who put out a video once a week, or even month, and they are forced to rely on Patreon (which is a great platform!). Not sure what the solution to this would be, but I feel similarly on the wading through garbage to get to the good stuff.
- random878 8y ago
  I completely agree. There's stuff on YouTube that I just can't see existing, or getting noticed, on alternative platforms. A great example would be a channel called 'Primitive Technology'[1]. It's superb, and I really enjoy each video despite having no real interest in the subject! But, this is 0.01% of YouTube. The rest is horrendous political videos pitched at the level of 4chan, vloggers aimed at 13 year olds, and millions of shaky footage of unboxing items. I wouldn't mind so much if there was a suitable way to curate a decent feed (without signing in and giving my life history to google). I generally only find out about the decent content on YouTube via word of mouth off-platform. [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA/videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA/vid...

theWheez 8y ago

As a platform, YouTube's incentives don't serve the user as well as they could. A prime example was a video with millions of views on a very popular channel about 9/11 conspiracies. Did the YouTuber believe them? No. But cranking out a 10m+ video every day is more important than what he believes. Then you look at high quality channels who put out a video once a week, or even month, and they are forced to rely on Patreon (which is a great platform!). Not sure what the solution to this would be, but I feel similarly on the wading through garbage to get to the good stuff.

random878 8y ago
I completely agree. There's stuff on YouTube that I just can't see existing, or getting noticed, on alternative platforms. A great example would be a channel called 'Primitive Technology'[1]. It's superb, and I really enjoy each video despite having no real interest in the subject! But, this is 0.01% of YouTube. The rest is horrendous political videos pitched at the level of 4chan, vloggers aimed at 13 year olds, and millions of shaky footage of unboxing items. I wouldn't mind so much if there was a suitable way to curate a decent feed (without signing in and giving my life history to google). I generally only find out about the decent content on YouTube via word of mouth off-platform. [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA/videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA/vid...