3 ms·
Thanks, I looked it up and it's very relevant to the discussion so I'll link it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go
by GFischer 16y ago
Thanks, I looked it up and it's very relevant to the discussion so I'll link it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich
"The Controlled Substances Act does not recognize the medical use of marijuana."
"The government also contended that consuming one's locally grown marijuana for medical purposes affects the interstate market of marijuana, and hence that the federal government may regulate and prohibit such consumption. This argument stems from the landmark New Deal case Wickard v. Filburn, which held that the government may regulate personal cultivation and consumption of crops, due to the effect of that consumption on interstate commerce, however minute it may be."
- chopsueyar 16y agoIt's fungible (according to the Court).