3 ms·
Savings because other stores didn't charge tax and Amazon did shouldn't count, because that'll change soon as the Supreme Court overturned Quill earlier this ye
by ikeboy 8y ago
Savings because other stores didn't charge tax and Amazon did shouldn't count, because that'll change soon as the Supreme Court overturned Quill earlier this year
- metaphor 8y agoMoney leaving my layman bank account today looks all the same regardless if it's colored product, shipping, or tax. When the Supreme Court's decision becomes the global ecommerce status quo, a reassessment of value will clearly be in order. Until then...
- ikeboy 8y agoI'm saying it'll be applied to all major US sellers relatively soon
- metaphor 8y agoI understood and wasn't contesting the implication. I was merely objecting to the notion that a favorable purchasing decision made by a consumer today by today's rules "shouldn't count" because a legal decision that will normalize ecommerce but has yet to be acted upon at scale (as perceived by consumers) is imminent.