3 ms·
As a native of Minneapolis, I support the gist of this policy. But I also have knowledge of the zoning history of the city, and the narrative in this story see
by flomo 8y ago
As a native of Minneapolis, I support the gist of this policy.
But I also have knowledge of the zoning history of the city, and the narrative in this story seems incredibly wrong. Minneapolis actually had "Manhattan" zoning in many areas up until the late 1980s. There had been very little new development in the prior 20 years, so the code became completely unrealistic. Local community groups pushed for zoning reform to preserve the as-built environment and communities.
Now those well-meaning progressive 1980s folks are being portrayed as "segregationists", despite the fact of who they actually were. They were trying to save their neighborhoods, but I guess every hero becomes a villain.
And, without even getting into it, Minneapolis was built up when the state was 97.5% white people. You could maybe find a class angle to this, but come on.
- 1001101 8y agoFor most of the 20th century, parts of Minneapolis and surrounding areas had racially restrictive deed covenants which prevented the sale or rental of property to people of color. So, those neighborhoods they were trying to save may have a legacy of structural racism. Examples and interactive map here: https://www.mappingprejudice.org/ https://www.mappingprejudice.org/
- masonic 8y agoSuch covenants were made unenforceable and rendered moot in 1948. http://www.bostonfairhousing.org/timeline/1948-Shelley-v-Kramer.html http://www.bostonfairhousing.org/timeline/1948-Shelley-v-Kra...