4 ms·
As a semi-pro photog who is very keen to quit Adobe completely, I'm very keen to try it out. Curious about privacy aspects though. When you say it's a private
by ObsoleteNerd 8y ago
As a semi-pro photog who is very keen to quit Adobe completely, I'm very keen to try it out.
Curious about privacy aspects though. When you say it's a private cloud, does it communicate back to your servers at all?
Any goals for Linux compatibility?
I'd love something that can store the photos on a NAS or network share drive, runs its processing in a Docker container on my LAN, and serves a web app locally with absolutely no external internet access. That's basically my dream photo manager. I can connect to my own LAN remotely to access it then, without any need for the privacy/security risk of hosting my (and my clients) photos on some 3rd party server.
- mceachen 8y agoI have installers for Mac, 64 bit Windows 10, and 64 bit Ubuntu. My CI suite runs all ~2,600 tests on all three platforms after every commit. Your images, videos, and metadata stay yours, and are not uploaded anywhere. Currently I've got error reporting that phones home if there are critical problems detected, but the log events only include the stack trace and possibly the path to the problem file. PhotoStructure spins up a webserver bound to localhost by default. In other words, other machines in your LAN can't open the PhotoStructure web UI (unless you set an environment variable or use ssh port forwarding). Sign up via the website or send me an email, I'd love to hear your thoughts and feedback.
- ObsoleteNerd 8y agoI've signed up via the site. Sounds very promising.