You failed to understand that science is built atop of epistemology. That is, there is no “post truth”, but rather that Foucault and all have long since provide

You failed to understand that science is built atop of epistemology. That is, there is no “post truth”, but rather that Foucault and all have long since provided massive amounts of research to indicate the shifting floors of epistemology, where science is wielded as power. More recently, Dr. Audra J Wolfe has been exploring this complex tapestry. http://audrajwolfe.com/ http://audrajwolfe.com/ > There is a very large range of quality of information, it is not all the same. The amount of bias and ulterior agenda in information varies hugely. Again, you’ve lost the thread when you are grounding yourself in an “this is information” and “this is not”. The question before your presumption is an epistemological one.