> it sounds like the real goal is just No. I suspect you have the kind of point of view where we might better first discuss the proposed data structure and TH

> it sounds like the real goal is just No. I suspect you have the kind of point of view where we might better first discuss the proposed data structure and THEN what we'll do with it. First, you'll want to learn about zzstructure/hyperthogonal structure: http://xanadu.com/zigzag/ http://xanadu.com/zigzag/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=zzstructure https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=zzstructure for a comparison of the above with Ubergraphs (a generalization of Ultragraphs, themselves a generalization of Hypergraphs), you'll want to check here: https://github.com/JeffreyBenjaminBrown/digraphs-with-text/issues/11 https://github.com/JeffreyBenjaminBrown/digraphs-with-text/i... Once you think you comprehend the above, consider spending some time thinking about how you could come up with a 'canonical', graphical user interface AND user experience for a Ubergraph that uses hyperthogonal structure. Then imagine how you'd implement such a data structure in a distributed, peer to peer, UNCENTRALIZABLE (not just decentralized!), secure manner. If you can imagine all of that and think you comprehend at least one tiny part of the implications of such a thing, then you comprehend about 1/10 of "the real goal" of Xanadu, and I invite you to consider continuing to ponder the possibilities.