3 ms·
Uhhh.... http://www.google.com/images?q=Trek+communicator&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1289&bih=803 http://www.google.com/images?q=Trek+communi
by DannoHung 16y ago
Uhhh.... http://www.google.com/images?q=Trek+communicator&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1289&bih=803 http://www.google.com/images?q=Trek+communicator&um=1...
- gaius 16y agoWhat am I looking at here? The Star Trek communicators are voice-only.
- jasonlotito 16y agoYou're forgetting that in those cases, beaming down was a result not of lack of video, but because of interference, or the classic "You have to see this for yourself" bit. More importantly, it made for a better show that way. Interstellar video was common enough, but I'd question the importance of having video conferencing on top of their voice only communicators. I'd go further, but then I'd be showing how much time I've wasted thinking about this. DS9>*, btw.
- polynomial 16y agoI seem to recall at least one episode where they showed the image of the person being communicated with in the communicator. Am I just imagining this? Or was it in one of the movie versions…?
- gaius 16y agoThey transmitted images from Georgie's vision thing once.