I think the "disgruntled" characterization in this case is quite accurate. I'm not sure how the ad hominem fallacy would apply since Jack Poulson is actually th

I think the "disgruntled" characterization in this case is quite accurate. I'm not sure how the ad hominem fallacy would apply since Jack Poulson is actually the source and subject of the article and thus the object of discussion. But the real point of my original comment was that this article is subpar journalism. The implication of the article, at least to my reading, is that there is a trend of declining morale at Google and dissatisfaction amongst the rank-and-file with the company's senior leadership. As evidence we are given... one guy's opinions.