11 ms·
It's wrong to call it "unconstitutional". California has no obligation to enforce federal law. From both an anti-prohibitionist and an anti-federalist perspect
by jacoblyles 16y ago
It's wrong to call it "unconstitutional". California has no obligation to enforce federal law.
From both an anti-prohibitionist and an anti-federalist perspective, I liked proposition 19. It's about time states pushed back against federal overreach.
>" If you think its acceptable for CA to ignore the FCSA, do you also think it's acceptable for states to ignore the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Obamacare, Federal Minimum Wage Laws?"
I never liked these "law and order" arguments. The civil rights protesters ignored state laws on segregation. What if they also ignored laws on rape, murder, and arson?
Law and order with bad laws is tyranny.
- tptacek 16y agoPeople who opposed civil rights legislation called those laws "tyranny", too. The word appears to mean "law that I disagree with".