> So, Futures are moving into the standard library; there’s been a last minute procedural issue over one name, and then they’ll be in. That's just the open iss

> So, Futures are moving into the standard library; there’s been a last minute procedural issue over one name, and then they’ll be in. That's just the open issue around pinning. There are however a few open discussions around the futures/task/waker parts, from the other RFC. I just wrote down a list of the open points here: https://github.com/aturon/rfcs/pull/15#issuecomment-445492382 https://github.com/aturon/rfcs/pull/15#issuecomment-44549238...