3 ms·
And the result is a JPEG holding both the original JPEG and ... text? JPEG and text is a horrible idea. Even with best quality settings, compression artefacts a
by ktpsns 8y ago
And the result is a JPEG holding both the original JPEG and ... text? JPEG and text is a horrible idea. Even with best quality settings, compression artefacts are visible.
Why don't you offer SVG export? That would solve all problems and make the embedding into websites really easy. You even can embed your JPEG into SVG (base64, you will loose a ~30% in file size but the lesser storage for the text gives it back).
- sbr464 8y agoI'm not the author, but I think the idea would be that you are sharing on instagram or similar, maybe in a story where you have the full image, then one or a few variations with the exif info displayed. I could see where it would be better than using an unformatted list of info in a comment, plus it doesn't crowd the description.
- p_red 8y agoExactly! Thank you.
- p_red 8y agoI hear you! More flexible export options will be introduced in the future for both format and size. Starting with fewer options and focusing on actual use cases is the priority for now. Thanks.