> “Noncompliant” explores one of the darkest chapters in modern American history, but with a crook and unabashed narcissist occupying the Oval Office, its lesso

> “Noncompliant” explores one of the darkest chapters in modern American history, but with a crook and unabashed narcissist occupying the Oval Office, its lessons are proving remarkably timely. The chapters in question took place during Obama's terms, and the repeal of the Glass-Steagal act was a bipartisan effort. Yet that sentence is implying that, if someone superficially decent was President (R or D), then this would somehow get fixed/those responsible would be prosecuted. I think it's pretty obvious that, if you want to go after Wall Street, you either need a third party, or to substantially change the two main ones.