> We don't spend nearly as much energy feeding the free-range ones, but the land-footprint needed to serve them is even greater. That land likely can't be used

> We don't spend nearly as much energy feeding the free-range ones, but the land-footprint needed to serve them is even greater. That land likely can't be used for anything else, only a small % of land can be used for growing crops. > The ones that live in tiny spaces and eat corn have high carbon footprints because of all the farming that has to happen to feed them and all the land that is prevented from being forest to serve that need. Only about 10-15% of US cattle heads are on feedlots at any given time. The food at feedlots doesn't always compete with human edible food, and only represents about 10% of their lifetime food.